grr, nits
Right, today's session wasn't a whole lot of fun because it basically went grind grind grind grind cooler grind grind cooler grind etc. I think I actually played okay except for maybe a couple hands which will be posted below.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392679
This is like the fourth hand. Checking turn behind to keep queens around and pot control vs trips. Rivered boat o rly. I have to chop about 2/3 of the time here for this to work, plus he might have a queen trying to rebluff. Plus, I mean, quads/royal?
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392693
Slowplaying your good hands? Hm, that checkraise seems like a draw. If it's the NFD, kudos, but if not or you actually had a jack go away now.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392695
It looks really gross to call the turn and fold the river brick, but the guy wasn't double barreling his bluffs, meaning that while I think he's checkraising air (granted, could be 97 but I think he leads flop) a lot of the time when he bets the river he's got top pair beat.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392706
At least the turn wasn't the 7d...either he had a ten or a draw on the flop. Or maybe a seven. Betting basically violates the prime rule, so I think just checking behind and calling a river bet on a nondiamond river is best. That four is bad because it gives 86 a straight, too. I dunno what I would've done had he bet; probably crying called but I'm not sure if it's +ev.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392723
Quads you right back, MFer.
Right, so that ended up busting that guy. I nuked two shortstacks and started playing this guy:
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392730
Not really a whole lot I can do here. I like checking the turn more than betting because I think he folds all non AK hands if I bet but might bet a queen or maybe KJ or just air. I'm pretty sure folding is just terrible.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392733
This was only interesting because of the minraise on the hand where he had kings up. His line looks bluffy, but I don't think he's aggro enough to call 97 and then shove it, so he either has a ten, which I think is unlikely, or a weakish ace.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392748
Guy was fairly tight postflop, but I'm still not sure about this one. Like, I think he calls ace high once but not twice because that's what most people tend to do, so I don't hate it on the surface, but it still feels spewy. I quit him after this because it was a long session and I wasn't sure if I was playing optimally.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392679
This is like the fourth hand. Checking turn behind to keep queens around and pot control vs trips. Rivered boat o rly. I have to chop about 2/3 of the time here for this to work, plus he might have a queen trying to rebluff. Plus, I mean, quads/royal?
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392693
Slowplaying your good hands? Hm, that checkraise seems like a draw. If it's the NFD, kudos, but if not or you actually had a jack go away now.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392695
It looks really gross to call the turn and fold the river brick, but the guy wasn't double barreling his bluffs, meaning that while I think he's checkraising air (granted, could be 97 but I think he leads flop) a lot of the time when he bets the river he's got top pair beat.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392706
At least the turn wasn't the 7d...either he had a ten or a draw on the flop. Or maybe a seven. Betting basically violates the prime rule, so I think just checking behind and calling a river bet on a nondiamond river is best. That four is bad because it gives 86 a straight, too. I dunno what I would've done had he bet; probably crying called but I'm not sure if it's +ev.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392723
Quads you right back, MFer.
Right, so that ended up busting that guy. I nuked two shortstacks and started playing this guy:
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392730
Not really a whole lot I can do here. I like checking the turn more than betting because I think he folds all non AK hands if I bet but might bet a queen or maybe KJ or just air. I'm pretty sure folding is just terrible.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392733
This was only interesting because of the minraise on the hand where he had kings up. His line looks bluffy, but I don't think he's aggro enough to call 97 and then shove it, so he either has a ten, which I think is unlikely, or a weakish ace.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1392748
Guy was fairly tight postflop, but I'm still not sure about this one. Like, I think he calls ace high once but not twice because that's what most people tend to do, so I don't hate it on the surface, but it still feels spewy. I quit him after this because it was a long session and I wasn't sure if I was playing optimally.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home